Gazette
masthead
   About The Gazette Search Back Issues Contact Us    
The newspaper of The Johns Hopkins University March 27, 2006 | Vol. 35 No. 27
 
Researchers Find 'Junk' DNA May Not Be So Junky After All

By Audrey Huang
Johns Hopkins Medicine

Researchers at the McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine at Johns Hopkins have invented a cost-effective and highly efficient way of analyzing what many have termed "junk" DNA and identified regions critical for controlling gene function. And they have found that these control regions from different species don't have to look alike to work alike, as traditionally thought.

The study was published online at Science Express on March 23.

The researchers developed a new system that uses zebra fish to test mammalian DNA and identify DNA sequences, known as enhancers, involved in turning on a gene. In studying RET, the major gene implicated in Hirschsprung disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia, the team identified DNA sequences that can control RET but had not been identified using standard methods. Hirschsprung disease, also known as congenital megacolon, is a relatively common birth defect marked by bowel obstruction. Multiple endocrine neoplasia, or MEN2, is an inherited predisposition to neuroendocrine cancers.

The notion that mutations in enhancers play a role in human disease progression has been difficult to confirm because usually enhancers are located in the 98 percent of the human genome that does not code for protein, termed noncoding DNA. Unlike DNA sequences that code for protein, noncoding DNA, sometimes referred to as "junk" DNA, follows few rules for organization and sequence patterns and therefore is more difficult to study.

"The difficulty with human genetic approaches to common disease is that we lack the power to precisely localize DNA sequences that are associated with disease, often leaving us immense stretches of DNA to look at," said one of the study's corresponding authors, Andy McCallion, an assistant professor in the McKusick-Nathans Institute. Most often one is limited to looking in the most obvious places, which may not yield the best results. "Until now," he said, "we've only been able to look under the lamplights for the car keys."

Traditionally, DNA sequences are thought to have to look similar to function similarly; this is how scientists identify genes in other species, a strategy best used for studying similar species. From an evolutionary standpoint, the last common ancestor of human and zebra fish lived more than 300 million years ago. Because DNA sequences in each species have changed over time, traditional methods of comparing DNA sequences between humans and zebra fish have failed to identify any potential enhancers around the RET gene because the DNA sequences differ too much.

That drove the Johns Hopkins researchers to seek and develop this new system, by which virtually any DNA sequence can be tested for its ability to turn on a marker gene in zebra fish embryos. The system is a significant advance over current methods in this model species, allowing researchers to study more sequences in a shorter period of time. Using this, they identified several human enhancers able to control expression consistent with the zebra fish RET gene.

Zebra fish have become the ideal system for doing these types of large-scale studies. They are small — only about a half inch in length — they grow quickly and are relatively inexpensive to maintain compared to mice or rats. "Zebra fish are the only vertebrate embryo you can even think about doing this type of work in," said Shannon Fisher, the study's first author and an assistant professor in cell biology in Johns Hopkins' Institute for Basic Biomedical Sciences.

The researchers' next steps are further study of the RET enhancers they found to identify other mutations that might contribute to Hirschsprung disease and MEN2, and to entice other investigators to collectively build a database of human enhancers.

"If there's one thing we've learned here, it's that we are not very good at recognizing enhancers. We just don't know what they look like," Fisher said. "We are anxious for others to use this technology on their favorite genes."

The researchers were funded by the March of Dimes and the National Institutes of Health.

Authors on the paper are Fisher, Elizabeth Grice, Ryan Vinton, Seneca Bessling and McCallion.

GO TO MARCH 27, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS.
GO TO THE GAZETTE FRONT PAGE.


The Gazette | The Johns Hopkins University | Suite 540 | 901 S. Bond St. | Baltimore, MD 21231 | 443-287-9900 | gazette@jhu.edu