|
 |
Our
laboratory group focuses its efforts on the molecular genetics
of gastrointestinal cancers and premalignant lesions, as well as
on translational research to improve early detection, prognostic
evaluation, and treatment of these conditions. Below, some
examples of this work are described.
carcinoma
is among the top ten causes of cancer death worldwide. This
disease is usually detected at advanced stages, when available
treatments are not very effective. Earlier detection of this
cancer has been shown to make a significant impact on patient
outcome. Our studies are yielding biomarkers capable of
diagnosing synchronous cancer based on gene expression patterns
in normal or premalignant tissues. We are extending these
studies to confirm that these biomarkers can predict future (metachronous)
esophageal cancer risk. Our ultimate goal is the translation of
these early detection biomarkers into clinical validation within
5 years. Specifically, we are pursuing the following Aims: Aim
1. In pilot cohort Phase I discovery studies using cDNA
microarrays, to develop biomarkers distinguishing between normal
or metaplastic tissues of patients with vs. without cancer. Aim
2.In a pilot cohort Phase II validation study, to confirm
expression panels and individual genes identified in Aim 1 with
quantitative RT-PCR (Q-PCR). Aim 3. In larger cohorts, to
perform Phase III cross-sectional retrospective longitudinal
validation studies using the Q-PCR method analytically validated
in Aim 2. Significant productivity has resulted in our ability
to distinguish the normal esophageal mucosae of patients with
esophageal cancer from normal mucosae of patients without
cancer. These findings offer the potential to screen patients
for the presence of cancer or diagnose cancer earlier by
assaying normal mucosa. We have also characterized a panel of
biomarkers that distinguish between responders and nonresponders
to radiation therapy. Plans will consist of extending our
esophageal genomics studies to continue to evaluate the
predictive value of tissue genomic and epigenomic biomarkers in
the early detection and treatment stratification realms. By
branching off a tangent from our setasides study and taking it
to the next level of validation, we hope to accelerate these
biomarkers into the clinical arena.

We have found
that freely circulating, abnormally methylated DNA occurs in the
plasma of patients with esophageal cancer. Specifically, these
data show that methylated alleles of the APC, HPP1 and p16 genes
can be detected in the bloodstream of esophageal cancer
patients. Furthermore, our data show decreased survival in
patients with high plasma levels of methylated APC DNA, which
also parallel relapse of malignancy. Thus, circulating
methylated nucleic acids are potential biomarkers for the
prognostication and monitoring of esophageal cancer patients.
The overall scope of this arm of our research is to move these
circulating biomarkers from the laboratory into the clinic. In
an initial exploratory phase, precise assays of gene-specific
methylated plasma DNA are being developed and refined using
quantitative real-time methylation-specific PCR, with the
established methylation targets p16 and APC serving as
templates. In addition, during this exploratory phase,
additional novel methylation targets are being identified in
neoplastic esophageal tissues and plasma. In a second,
developmental phase, novel methylation targets identified in the
exploratory phase are clinically validated on a larger,
independent cohort by performing clinical correlations with
tissue and plasma methylation levels.
Specifically,
we are pursuing the following Aims: Aim 1. To develop and
validate accurate, robust, standardizable, scalable quantitative
real-time plasma DNA methylation assays using the established
tissue and plasma methylation targets p16 and APC. Assays are
analytically validated with known standards of plasma from
normal subjects spiked with known levels of genomic DNA, as well
as known but blinded positive and negative patient blood
samples. Aim 2. To identify and measure 20 novel methylation
events in 50 primary esophageal carcinomas and 50 normal
esophageal tissues. A panel of candidate genes with known cancer
and outcome relevance and reported frequent methylation in
gastrointestinal and other human tumors is evaluated using
real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Genes
methylated in at least 20% of tumors, but in less than 5% of
normal specimens, are further pursued in Aim 3. Aim 3. To study
the same pilot group of 50 patients for plasma methylation of
target genes identified in tissues during Aim 2. Genes
methylated in the plasma of greater than 10% of these patients
constitute plasma targets for clinical validation during the
developmental phase. The goals of the developmental study phase
of the study are first to develop a prediction model, based on
tissue and plasma levels of methylation targets identified
during the exploratory phase, on a training cohort of 168
patients. This prediction model is then tested on an independent
cohort of 88 patients to establish its clinical validity in
prognostic, treatment response, and recurrence risk prediction.
Samples and clinical data collected and stored in a clinically
well-characterized tissue bank and database are being used to
establish the clinical validity of these biomarkers during the
developmental phase. Plasma and tissue gene-specific methylation
levels are correlated with clinical parameters, including
demographics, initial stage, histologic grade, overall and
disease-specific survival, interval to tumor recurrence or
progression (disease-free and progression-free intervals), type,
dosage and timing of treatments received, and additional
features (e.g., degree of clinical response to
radio/chemotherapy, downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy. Aim
4. To construct a prediction model based on tissue and plasma
methylation markers identified during the exploratory phase
vs. clinical outcome data corresponding to 168 patients.
Single-marker as well as multiple-marker panels are being tested
as predictive biomarkers using the Cox proportional hazards
model, generalized additive models, artificial neural networks,
linear discriminant analysis, and additional methods. Internal
validation is accomplished by performing cross-validation. Aim
5. To externally validate the prediction models developed in Aim
4. The tissue and/or plasma markers identified by prediction
modeling in Aim 4 are being blindly measured in an independent
88-patient cohort, clinical data are collected and entered into
a database, and statistical models are tested using the same
correlative analyses used in the original prediction models.

esophagus
(BE) is a premalignant condition that predisposes patients to
the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma (ADCA). Because of
this increase in cancer risk, patients with BE undergo
recommended endoscopic surveillance (EGD) at regular intervals
indefinitely, every two to three years, sometimes submitting to
as many as 10 EGDs per lifetime.
Because the incidence of ADCA in BE is rare (less than 1 per 100
patients per year), most surveillance EGDs in BE will not
uncover cancer. The currently accepted marker for cancer risk is
histologic dysplasia, with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) being
considered a much more accurate and higher risk factor than
low-grade dysplasia (LGD). However, better tissue-based markers
capable of predicting progression to HGD or ADCA are needed. For
the past several years, we have studied the role of DNA
methylation in esophageal ADCA origin and progression. We showed
that key tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) that become methylated in
BE (metaplasia) actually function as biomarkers in the process,
predicting whether patients with BE will or will not progress to
develop HGD or ADCA. We have now taken this finding a step
further: We have incorporated the three tumor suppressor genes
involved in the earlier model (p16, HPP1, RUNX3, and their
combined methylation index) plus 4 relevant clinical parameters
(age, sex, length of BE, and histologic presence or absence of
LGD) to construct 2 models using linear discriminant analysis (LDA).
We will research a 3-tier stratification model whereby patients
will be stratified into high risk (HR), intermediate risk (IR),
and low risk (LR) groups. HR patients will be endoscoped more
frequently than usual (once per year), IR patients will be
endoscoped at the customary interval (once every 2 years), and
LR patients will be endoscoped less often than usual (once per 4
years). We will accomplish the following Specific Aims:
Specific Aim 1: In a blinded pilot study in Year 1, we will
analyze methylation profiles and perform risk analysis using the
3-layer model outlined in our Preliminary Data on the samples
from our consortia and headquarters sites; Specific Aim 2: If
acceptable accuracy results and Milestones are met (see below),
in years 2 and 3 we will expand the number of consortia and
broaden our study to achieve greater assay automation, enlarge
assay generalizability, make the assay adherent to CLIA and FDA
standards, perform exploratory research to fine-tune the assay,
add or subtract clinical or biomolecular markers to sharpen the
current panel, and develop statistical and bioinformatics tools
to ramp up power on the bioanalytic side.


Best ROC
curves of 2- and 4-year prediction models.
A: For the 2-year prediction model, the best AUROC (0.818916)
was obtained with 3 parameters: age, segment length, and M.I. B:
For the 4-year model, the best AUROC (0.807844) was acquired
using 3 parameters: pathology (non-neoplastic BE vs. LGD), and
M.I.
instability
(MSI), caused by defective DNA mismatch repair, occurs
frequently in colorectal carcinomas. MSI is categorized as high
(MSI-H), low, (MSI-L), or negative (MSS, or microsatellite-stable),
according to the frequency of microsatellite alterations at
anonymous (noncoding) loci. Tumors with high-frequency MSI (MSI-H
tumors) have clinical behavior that distinguishes them from MSS
and MSI-L tumors. In addition, evidence is mounting that tumors
with low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) tumors have unique features.
Nevertheless, our understanding of both MSI-H and MSI-L tumors
remains incomplete, and the existence of MSI-L tumors as a
distinct subgroup has been questioned. Hypothesis: MSI-H, MSI-L,
and MSS gastrointestinal tumors are phenotypically unique. These
distinct biologies can be better defined and understood through
comprehensive genomic approaches, including instabilotyping and
microarray-based bioinformatics. Moreover, valuable insights
into molecular pathways underlying these entities can be gained
by identifying and studying candidate genes. This hypothesis
will be pursued via the following Specific Aims: 1.To broaden
and extend instabilotyping of MSI-H colorectal cancers and cell
lines, identifying additional genes targeted by frameshift
mutation; 2.To examine functional consequences of mutations in
coding region targets of microsatellite instability; 2.a. To
demonstrate biallelic inactivation of genes showing frequent
frameshift mutation by analyzing for loss of heterozygosity,
point mutation, and altered expression; 2.b. To determine
functional differences between WT and mutant candidate proteins,
ascertaining the effect(s) of mutant proteins on cell biology
and behavior by transfecting WT candidate genes into mutated
cells and ascertaining effect(s): 2.b.i. To assess cell
proliferation, anchorage independent growth, invasion, mobility,
apoptosis, and differentiation; 2.b.ii.To evaluate effects of
WT-transfected ACTR2 and other candidate genes on protein
expression and signal transduction, including phosphorylated and
total SMAD2, total SMAD4, caspase 1, and TTK; 2.b.iii. Using
cDNA microarrays, to compare colon cancer cells before and after
transfection with WT ACTR2, TTK, HDCMA18, CASP1, and as-yet
unidentified genes containing frequently mutated microsatellites;
3.To increase our understanding of MSI-H, MSI-L, and MSS
colorectal carcinomas by comparing the transcriptomes of these
cancers, using cDNA microarrays and bioinformatics strategies;
3.a.To generate global gene expression data from MSI-H, MSI-L,
and MSS colorectal tumors: 3.a.i.To produce and probe cDNA
microarrays with RNAs from MSI-H and MSS cells; 3.a.ii.To
hybridize microarrays to MSI-H, MSI-L, and MSS colorectal
tumors; 3.b.To determine whether MSI-L tumors comprise a
biologically distinct subgroup: 3.b.i.To apply bioinformatics
strategies to confirm the existence and provide clues to the
biology of a distinct MSI-L tumor subgroup; 3.c. To identify
genes defining molecular genetic pathways underlying MSI-H, MSS,
and MSI-L tumors: 3.c.i. To use principal components analysis (PCA)
to find genes segregating with MSI status, and significance
analysis of microarray data (SAM) to identify genes that are
differentially expressed among these three tumor groups.
Results of PCA analysis of MSI-H, MSI-L, and MSS tumors.
PCA was applied to microarray data from 41 tumors of varying MSI
status (see text). Component 3 of these data is able to make this
distinction (vertical axis). However, more surprising was our
finding that MSI-L tumors can be discriminated from MSS and MSI-H
tumors (component 10, horizontal axis). Thus, the yellow spheres in
this Figure represent the MSI-L tumors and tend to form a distinct
group; the purple spheres, the MSI-H tumors, also seem to constitute
a separate group; and the blue spheres, the MSS tumors, form a third
group in this Figure. These findings are novel and important in two
respects: 1) the existence of MSI-L tumors as a discrete subgroup
has been challenged and is controversial; and 2) MSI-H tumors, to
our knowledge, have not been previously defined purely on the basis
of their global gene expression patterns.
cancer
is the most prevalent malignancy and the leading cause of death
in the digestive system in the United States. To improve
clinical care and early detection of this disease, novel
molecular biomarkers and a comprehensive understanding of
molecular pathology are valuable. Aberrant gene silencing by hypermethylation at CpG islands covering the promoter region is
a major hallmark of human cancer of multiple organs, and
promoter hypermethylation of some genes is of diagnostic value.
In this context, we are conducting global scanning for novel
genes with aberrant promoter methylation in colon cancer using a
differential expression pattern-oriented approach. We have
conducted cDNA microarray analyses of normal and tumorous colon
tissues and identified 370 of 14,000 genes to be down-regulated
in tumors by Significance Analysis of Microarray Data (SAM). We
have prioritized 50 of these 370 genes as candidate targets of
tumor-specific methylation using the following criteria: a)
presence of CpG islands overlapping the 5’UTR region; b)
putative functional linkage to cancer or known genetic
alterations in cancer; and c) upregulation of mRNA expression by
5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) treatment, an established
in vitro DNA demethylating method. Microarray experiments on
colon cancer cell lines with and without 5-aza-dC treatment have
been performed to obtain this information. Candidate target
genes are being further pre-screened using 14 colon cancer cell
lines and normal colon mucosae for the presence of
tumor-specific CpG island methylation by methylation specific
PCR (MSP). Correlation between the presence of a methylated
allele and downregulated mRNA expression is confirmed by
real-time quantitative RT-PCR at this stage. Genes showing
tumor-specific CpG island methylation correlating with
downregulated mRNA expression in cell lines are further analyzed
on primary tumors. Finally, we conduct real-time quantitative
MSP on 57 primary colon tumors for genes selected by
pre-screening cell lines. Correlations between promoter
hypermethylation and clinical features for the cases are
evaluated as well. We are uncovering previously understudied
genes involved in colon carcinogenesis through promoter
hypermethylation-mediated gene silencing. These findings
constitute novel biomarkers for early cancer detection, tailored
treatment, and molecular therapies.
  
Chronic
idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) predisposes to the
development of colorectal carcinoma. The molecular basis of this
predisposition has been studied for many years, but much remains
to be discovered. For example, we know that unique global gene
expression patterns occur early in IBD-associated neoplasias (IBDNs),
and that hypermethylation of certain promoter regions is a
mechanism of gene inactivation in these lesions. But at which
neoplastic stage do these alterations occur during IBD-associated
carcinogenesis? Can individual genes be identified from global
genomic screens of expression, methylation, or change in copy
number? Which global patterns or individual gene alterations
predict early neoplastic transformation or progression? The
current research project will answer these questions by
developing the following unifying hypothesis: The study of IBDNs
at all stages of evolution will benefit from global,
comprehensive genomic approaches that will illuminate molecular
genetic carcinogenetic pathways while simultaneously discovering
clinically valuable neoplastic progression biomarkers. This
hypothesis will be developed by pursuing the following Aims:
1.To perform a genome-wide characterization of the epigenetic
signature of IBD-associated neoplasias (IBDNs), focusing on
known as well as novel CpG islands in the promoter or upstream
portions of genes. a. Known methylation targets will be
analyzed, including E-cadherin(CDH1), p16, p15, p14-ARF,
death-associated protein kinase (DAPK), O6-methylguanine DNA
methyltransferase (MGMT), human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1),
adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), RASSF1A, deleted in colon
carcinoma (DCC), and 14-3-3-F.
b. Searches for novel targets of methylation in IBDNs will be
performed using CpG island microarrays. 2. To comprehensively
scan the genome for alterations in gene copy number at each
stage of IBD-neoplasia. a. To probe cDNA microarrays with
genomic DNA in order to identify specific genes involved by DNA
amplification and deletion in IBDNs. 3. To perform global gene
expression studies of IBDNs using cDNA microarrays. a. To
produce cDNA microarrays and probe them with RNAs from IBDNs at
all stages of neoplasia. b. To use hierarchical clustering,
significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) and artificial neural
networks (ANNs) to identify global expression patterns and
specific genes at each stage of IBD-associated neoplastic
progression. 4. To perform clinical correlations with molecular
data. a. Bioinformatics algorithms will be used to define gene
expression patterns associated with neoplastic progression in
IBDN. b.Clinical parameters will be correlated with gene
expression, methylation and copy number data to delineate
specific genes potentially relevant to neoplastic progression in
IBD.

|