masterplan graphic  
 
Why a new campus plan?
Who's Involved?
Principles
The planning process
The final plan
Summary of the concept plan
Summer 2000 Open Space Implementation
Working Papers
Tour the Homewood Campus
Sign our guestbook
Search the Site
Johns Hopkins University: A Plan for Homewood Campus
Architects and Planners
222 Saint Paul Place Baltimore, MD 21202
Phone 410/347-8500
Fax 410/347-8519
Email info@ASGArchitects.com
Meeting Report

PROJECT NAME: Johns Hopkins University Homewood Campus Plan
PROJECT NUMBER: Ayers/Saint/Gross No. 9895.00
MEETING DATE: March 23, 2000
SUBJECT: Working Group
ATTENDEES: Steve Campbell, JHU
Jerry Schnydman, JHU
Paul Taylor, JHU
Dennis O'Shea, JHU
Alan Stone, JHU
Tom Calder, JHU
Andy Pergam, JHU
Steven Marra, JHU
Mary Ellen Porter, JHU
Janet Sanfilippo, JHU
Michael Vergason, MVLA
Luanne Greene, ASG
DISCUSSION

The final draft of the Homewood Campus Plan was reviewed. The following items were discussed:

Given that the Space Telescope Expansion project is on indefinite hold, could the proposed building on the R Lot be made bigger and the Space Telescope site eliminated?

The theoretical sequence of parking garage construction was prioritized by Steve Campbell as first the Wyman lot, then the Bookstore, Space Telescope, building between Mudd and McCauley, and Garland Field.

The possibility of shuttle buses and even MTA buses stopping on Charles Street at the new drop-off was discussed. There was concern expressed at the unfriendly image of the big gates being normally in the closed position. A possible solution is to leave the iron gates open then add a small arm-type gate or movable sign to control traffic during the day. The big gates may be then closed at night.

It was summarized that the Campus Plan (with supporting principles, diagrams, and design guidelines) represent the University's intentions toward the buildings, grounds, and circulation for the foreseeable future, and in fact, beyond. There was considerable discussion about the relative merits of indicating the potential building sites with architectural articulation v. diagrammatic blocks. Paul Taylor expressed his preference for a more diagrammatic approach.

The current design of the Open Space project for this summer was reviewed. Concern was expressed that serious campus-wide accessibility problems will not be remedied by this summer's construction--specifically the stair-only connections from the Upper Quad north and south. Building renovations will be required to solve those points of inaccessibility. The third major point of campus inaccessibility will be solved this summer by the construction of a ramp from the lower level of Kreiger/Maryland Halls up to the Lower Quad.

Concern was expressed about the conflict of the traditional tent over the Upper Quad for graduation and the proposed planting of additional trees in that area.

Respectfully submitted,
AYERS/SAINT/GROSS, INC.
Luanne G. Greene, AIA
Principal

Copies To: Steve Campbell for JHU distribution
Michael Vergason, MVLA
George Alexiou, Martin/Alexiou/Bryson
Adam Gross, ASG


LINK TO JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
© 2000 The Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, Maryland.
Last updated 14Jul00 by dgips@jhu.edu