|
DISCUSSION
1. ASG reviewed the major conclusions of the Observations
Phase. Three planning principles were proposed.
Natural Systems: Restore and protect the integrity of the
wooded stream valley as a visual, recreational, and educational
resource.
* Minimize additional impervious area
* Remove invasive, exotic species
* Initiate replacement canopy of the woodland
* Develop a pathway system connecting the stream valley to the
campus
* Stop the encroachment into the wooded ravine and extended the
woodland fingers into the core campus
Core Campus: Improve the aesthetic character of campus to a
level that is consistent with the stature of the
institution.
* Diminish the presence of vehicles
* Extend the open space structure as connected courts, quads, and
gardens framed by buildings
* Strengthen the architectural coherence with buildings of
consistent scale and character
* Improve the landscape treatment of the existing quads
* Enrich the experience of moving through the campus with
additional art and water
Urban Village: Apply the University's energy and resources to
improve the vitality and character east of Charles Street as a
college town within the city.
* Strengthen the physical relationship with Charles Village
* Improve the pedestrian linkages across Charles Street
* Engage in the Charles Street redesign effort to promote
University interests
* Expand and diversify the programmatic use of University
properties in Charles Village
* Support the retail vitality of St. Paul Street.
2. ASG reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of the
circulation diagrams that had been considered.
3. ASG presented the proposed Concept Plan. The following
items were discussed:
* JHU involvement with Charles Street redesign is a must.
* The campus is full of booby traps - if you enter at the grand
gates on Charles Street, it doesn't get you anywhere.
* There are a variety of opinions concerning the idea of a
consistent and/or coherent architectural character on campus.
Another session is needed to substantively discuss principles of
architectural style and character.
* A separate meeting with the BMA is needed.
* There was a suggestion that Janet Sanfilippo schedule a
briefing
with the University's state lobbyist.
Respectfully submitted,
AYERS/SAINT/GROSS, INC.
Luanne G. Greene, AIA
Principal |