masterplan graphic  
 
Why a new campus plan?
Who's Involved?
Principles
The planning process
The final plan
Summary of the concept plan
Summer 2000 Open Space Implementation
Working Papers
Tour the Homewood Campus
Sign our guestbook
Search the Site
Johns Hopkins University: A Plan for Homewood Campus
Architects and Planners
222 Saint Paul Place Baltimore, MD 21202
Phone 410/347-8500
Fax 410/347-8519
Email info@ASGArchitects.com
Meeting Report

PROJECT NAME: Johns Hopkins University Homewood Campus Plan
PROJECT NUMBER: Ayers/Saint/Gross No. 9895.00
MEETING DATE: August 11, 1999
SUBJECT: Community Relations/Facilities/Infrastructure, and Accessibility
Focus Group Meeting
ATTENDEES: Bret Schreiber, JHU
Audrey Howard, Guilford/Homeland
Mary Washington, Abell
Wendy Kronmiller, Abell
Joe Rexing, CVCA/PUD
Sandy Sparks, Wyman Park Dell, CVPUD, CVCA
Louise Toomey, Greenway
Sheila Garrity, Greenway
Myles Hoenig, Waverly
Kathleen Basham, BMA
Bill Miller, GHCC
Dan Klocke, CVCBD
John Spurrier, CVCA
Steve Campbell, JHU
Renee Cohen, Rep. Cardin
Adrienne Bell, Baltimore City Planning
Diane Caslow, Union Memorial Hospital
Luanne Greene, Ayers/Saint/Gross
Adam Gross, Ayers/Saint/Gross
Suzanne Holden, Ayers/Saint/Gross
DISCUSSION

ASG reviewed the major conclusions of the Observations Phase. Three planning principles were proposed.

Natural Systems: Restore and protect the integrity of the wooded stream valley as a visual, recreational, and educational resource.
* Minimize additional impervious area
* Remove invasive, exotic species
* Initiate replacement canopy of the woodland
* Develop a pathway system connecting the stream valley to the campus
* Stop the encroachment into the wooded ravine and extended the woodland fingers into the core campus

Core Campus: Improve the aesthetic character of campus to a level that is consistent with the stature of the institution.
* Diminish the presence of vehicles
* Extend the open space structure as connected courts, quads, and gardens framed by buildings
* Strengthen the architectural coherence with buildings of consistent scale and character
* Improve the landscape treatment of the existing quads
* Enrich the experience of moving through the campus with additional art and water

Urban Village: Apply the University's energy and resources to improve the vitality and character east of Charles Street as a college town within the city.
* Strengthen the physical relationship with Charles Village
* Improve the pedestrian linkages across Charles Street
* Engage in the Charles Street redesign effort to promote University interests
* Expand and diversify the programmatic use of University properties in Charles Village
* Support the retail vitality of St. Paul Street.

ASG reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of the circulation diagrams that had been considered and presented the proposed Concept Plan. The following items were discussed:

* The distribution of campus parking is important.
Adopt a street/stream/greenway programs should be considered.
*An implementation strategy should be a focus of the final plan.
* The portals, especially along Charles Street, need to be clear. Where is 3400 N. Charles Street? The campus is a tourist destination.
* Shared parking with the BMA should be considered.
* The geometric relationship between the campus and the Wyman Park building should be carefully considered.

Respectfully submitted,
AYERS/SAINT/GROSS, INC.
Luanne G. Greene, AIA
Principal

Copies to: Steve Campbell for JHU distribution
Bret Schreiber for Committee distribution
Janet Sanfilippo, JHU
George Alexiou, PBQ&D
Michael Vergason, MVLA
Dan Paulien, Paulien & Associates
Adam Gross, ASG
Suzanne Holden, ASG


LINK TO JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
© 2000 The Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, Maryland.
Last updated 14Jul00 by dgips@jhu.edu