|

| |
Co-Contaminant Effects on Risk Assessment and
Remediation Activities Involving Urban Sediments and Soils
|
| EPA Agreement Number |
R828771-0-01 |
| Investigators |
William P. Ball (JHU)
Edward J. Bouwer
(JHU) |
| Type of Research |
Basic Research (Laboratory and Modeling) |
| Project Period |
10/1/01 - 9/30/02 |
| Objectives of Research |
|
|
Contaminated sites typically involve complex mixtures of contaminants,
the fate of which is affected by both biochemical interactions that
impact microbial attenuation (e.g., cometabolic effects, competitive
inhibition and toxicity), as well as competitive adsorption on solid
phases that can complicate mass transfer rates during desorption.
Because sediment- or soil-bound contaminants are usually not
bioavailable (from either a remediation or biotoxicity viewpoint),
successful prediction and assessment of fate and transport require a
full accounting and integration of the sorption effects. The solid
phases from which desorption must be considered include sediments,
surface soils and subsurface geologic materials, all of which can
contain substantial quantities of thermally altered or "black"
carbon, such as the chars, soot, and coals that are ubiquitous to urban
environments. Such black
carbon materials will tend to both strengthen the sorption effect and to
add complexity to our modeling approaches, and especially so under
conditions of contamination by multiple chemicals in mixtures.
With the above as background, the overall goal of this research is to evaluate the need and develop
the means to achieve improved modeling of the transport and fate of
organic chemical contaminants, as applied to risk assessment and
management for contaminated sediments and soils.
Objectives are to
develop new data and modeling approaches that can be applied toward
better predictions of the combined effects of both sorption and
biodegradation on organic contaminants, with a focus on solid phases
typical of urban environments and on chemical fate in the presence of
complex organic contaminant mixtures.
Specific sub-objectives of the work are:
(1) to apply modeling simulations to evaluate the impact of
nonlinear and competitive sorption on rates of desorption; (2) to
experimentally evaluate sources and mechanisms of nonlinear and
competitive sorption in environmentally relevant solids; and (3) to
develop and evaluate alternative (mechanistically based) approaches for
quantifying overall rates of desorption and biodegradation in
contaminated soil/water environments that include complex mixtures of
contaminants. |
| Project
Summary/Accomplishments |
| Our proposed experimental approach for this
project is based on a combination of computer modeling and laboratory
evaluation. In the
sub-sections below, we very briefly describe our progress in each of
these two areas. |
| Modeling.
Modeling has been conducted in order to better understand the
role of nonlinear adsorption on long-term desorption and biodegradation.
This effort has been accomplished primarily by a post-doctoral
associate who has worked approximately 50% time on this project since
his arrival at JHU in late October of 2001 (Isam Sabbah).
Dr. Sabbah came to JHU from a research position with the Regional
Research & Development Center of the Galilee Society and has degrees
in both chemical engineering (B.S.) and environmental engineering (M.Sc.,
Ph.D.), all from the Israel Institute of Technology (Technion).
On this project, he made progress on the development of numerical
computer models to simulate the combined effects of nonlinear adsorption
isotherms and diffusion limitations on rates of contaminant desorption
under hypothetical scenarios of sorption "loading" and
desorption, assuming sorbing particles that are modeled after those
previously studied in our laboratory (e.g., sediments from Bozeman,
Montana and CFB Borden in Canada).
More specifically, "known" nonlinear equilibrium
isotherm information and intraparticle diffusion rate constants for
these materials have been used to conduct alternative model simulations
of long-term contaminant desorption and bioavailability, as based on
model formulations and parameterizations that might be obtained from
both short-term and longer-term sorption uptake experiments.
We have explored the extent to which sorption nonlinearity and a
failure to experimentally evaluate truly long-term equilibrium can lead
to inaccurate estimate of rate parameters and subsequently inaccurate
predictions of biodegradation and desorption.
The results obtained to date have shown that desorptive mass flux
can be extremely sensitive to the "perceived" reality of the
sorption isotherm. Since
desorptive mass flux is an important determinant of contaminant
persistence at waste sites, very careful experimentation will be
required to fully understand long-term and non-linear contaminant
distribution. The computer code that has been written will be the basis for
future work in which competitive sorption is introduced. (See
"Future Activities.") |
| Laboratory
Experimentation.
In regard to laboratory experimentation, our proposed approach
focused on the application of a previously published method (Gustafsson et
al., 1997; Environ. Sci. &
Technol, 31:203-209) to estimate black carbon (BC) content of field
samples, including harbor sediments, brownfield soils, and other sites
of contamination in urban settings and to obtain screening–level
sorption equilibrium and rate data using nonpolar organic chemical
probes. Toward this end, a
doctoral student (Thanh Nguyen) has fully implemented the Gustafsson et al. approach in our laboratory and has been conducting an
evaluation of the method with regard to its ability to discern soot and
char samples. Because early
results were not encouraging, we have had to expand that study.
We now have a very complete dataset relating to the method.
Regrettably, these results cause us to believe that the method
will not be able to provide unambiguous results about black carbon (and
especially char) in soils and sediments. We presented this work to
colleagues at an international conference (see
"Publications/Presentations") and have a manuscript in
progress. Nonetheless, we
intend to proceed with an evaluation of sorption properties on some
selected field samples in the second year of the project.
Given our results with the BC method, however,
these sorption results will
now be viewed as examples for our modeling exercise, with less emphasis
on integrating the BC measurement into the modeling approach. (See
"Future Activities.")
|
| Publications/Presentations |
|
- Nguyen, T.H., W.P Ball, and R.A. Brown,
"Preliminary Investigation of Thermal Treatment for
Quantification of Black Carbon in Environmental Samples,"
poster presentation, Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference
of the International Humic Substances Society,
pp 302-305, Boston MA, July 21-26, 2002.
(A related manuscript is in preparation.)
- Nguyen, T.H., W.P Ball, and R.A.
Brown, "Investigation of Thermal Treatment for Quantification
of Black Carbon in Environmental Samples," poster presentation
at the Gordon Research Conference on Environmental Sciences: Water,
Holderness, NH, June 23-27, 2002.
- Sabbah, I., E.J. Bouwer, and W.P. Ball,
"Diffusion as a Source of Confusion: Complications and
Misconceptions in the Interpretation of Desorption Data,"
poster presentation at the Gordon Research Conference on
Environmental Sciences: Water, Holderness, NH, June 23-27, 2002.
(A related manuscript is in preparation.)
|
| Future
Activities |
|
| Modeling. Future modeling efforts
will apply postulated numerical models to evaluate the sensitivity of
overall degradation rates to both biochemical issues and nonlinear
adsorption effects. We intend to survey selected Superfund sites in the
region in order to select some waste mixtures and model
parameterizations. Using these selected conditions as case studies, we
intend to apply our models toward estimating the magnitude of effect
that co-contaminants may have on both desorption and degradation.
In addition to direct effects on biodegradation rates, competing
co-solutes are expected to lead to more linear sorption during both
sorption and desorption. These
effects are too complex to understand without modeling, however, owing
to the fact that concentrations are also controlled by processes of
intrasorbent diffusion.
|
| Laboratory Experimentation. We also
intend to obtain field samples of harbor sediments and Superfund site
soils and, if constraints of personnel time and budget permit, to
conduct screening–level sorption equilibrium and rate tests using
nonpolar organic chemical probes. In
this work, our emphasis will be on testing for sorption nonlinearity and
competition. The results of
this work will allow us to better relate our continuing modeling
sensitivity exercises to actual case scenarios. |
| Supplemental Keywords |
toxic chemicals, chlorinated organic chemicals,
sorption, biodegradation, competitive adsorption, cleanup, restoration,
hydrogeology |
|