Climate Analysis

The Climate Change and Human Health Integrated Assessment Web

Home News and Events FAQs Links About Us Resources Search Policy Areas

Background

Proposed Analysis

Climate Analysis Links

Background

Climatic data for the United States reveal changes and variations that may be significant in redistributing vector-borne and water-borne diseases, as well as direct climate-induced human morbidity and mortality. Since the turn of the century average daily temperatures in the conterminous United States have increased by approximately 0.4 degrees C, with most of this increase occurring during the past 30 years (Karl et al. 1995b). Recent studies have shown that the hydrologic cycle in the US is changing as indicated by increases in cloud cover (Karl and Steurer 1990) and precipitation (Groisman and Easterling 1994) and decreases in pan evaporation (Peterson 1996). Extremes in US precipitation have been changing with increases in heavy precipitation events and decreases in lighter precipitation events (Karl et al. 1995a; Karl et al. 1996). Using data back to 1910, Karl et al. found that the most recent 15 years had the highest values of Greenhouse Climate Response Index (GCRI) as well as Climate Extremes Index (CEI). It is becoming increasingly apparent that measurable changes in climate trends are occurring in the US.

NCDC contains the largest archive of climate and climate-related data in the world. These data, to be purchased from NCDC, will be used to refine our current understanding of the relation between infectious disease and weather stress on human health. Through collaboration across disciplines, existing infectious disease models, such as USDA's models for tick-borne disease and mosquito-borne dengue fever, will be refined and new models developed to study water-borne cholera and cryptosporidiosis. Climate data currently available include the Summary of the Day, Co-Operative data set (TD-3200) which includes daily values of maximum and minimum temperature and total precipitation for the entire US Cooperative Observing Network (over 7000 stations). Data are also available from the Summary of the Day, First Order data set (TD-3210) which includes, in addition to temperature and precipitation, variables such as humidity, wind speed and direction, and cloud cover for approximately 400 stations in the US, Caribbean, and Pacific islands. The Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (COADS) contains observations of sea-surface temperature (SSTs), wind, and temperature taken from ships-of-opportunity for the entire globe. Satellite data (e.g., NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer - AVHRR) can be accessed to provide information on land surface vegetation, ocean temperatures and inferred circulation, and Expendable Bathythermograph (XBT) data and hydrographic data can be obtained to determine anomalies for salinity.

Proposed Analyses (September 1, 1997)

Several methods are available to develop climate change scenarios suitable for use in climate-driven models of disease incidence and spread. These methods include: 1) direct use of climate model output from a General Circulation Model (GCM) or from regional climate models nested into a GCM; 2) empirical methods that take existing observed data ( e.g. observations of temperature and precipitation for a given observing station) and perform a geographical or temporal shift of the data; and 3) the downscaling approach that combines the use of a GCM simulation and observational data (Robinson and Finkelstein 1989). Each approach has advantages and drawbacks; for example, empirical methods have the advantage of being tied directly to the existing surface climate, while direct use of the GCM simulation itself does not provide the spatial resolution necessary to drive impact models, and assumes statistical distributions under climate change that may not be valid. Statistical downscaling is an attractive option that can: 1) link a GCM simulation to the observed statistical distribution for a given observing station using the parameters from the GCM that are well simulated by the model (Karl et al. 1990); and, 2) develop climate scenarios using transient GCM simulations (Easterling 1996). Our choice is to purchase downscaled climate scenarios developed at NCDC using coupled Ocean Atmosphere General Circulation Models which provide internally consistent scenarios of climate and the associated ensemble of weather events during the next century. Where appropriate, we also will purchase statistical simulations developed at NCDC using weather generators and simple Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) models. Any climate scenario, regardless of the method used, must be considered solely as a plausible outcome of potential climate change. GCMs are physically-based models of the climate system, so any GCM simulation is subject to the uncertainties inherent in any non-linear system, particularly one that is forced by such factors as increased greenhouse gases, and tropospheric aerosols.

Climate Analysis Links

Center for Earth Observation (CEO)
National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information System (NEDIS)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
US Geological Survey (USGS)
US Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics (USGLOBEC)
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
Working Group of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCCWGI)
World Meteorological Organization (WMO)

 

 

jh_orbit.gif (1799 bytes)

  This page was updated 09/12/01 12:25 PM
© 1998, 1999, 2000 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Maryland
This web was sponsored by grant from the Environmental Protection Agency.  Research on the grant concluded December, 2000.